Commenting on the story: Adelaide Uni in ‘reasonably good shape’ ahead of merger talks

The State Government seems intent on forcing The University of Adelaide and UniSA into a merger. However, they have not put forward any convincing argument for how this will benefit higher education in South Australia, other than vague statements that Bigger Must Be Better. How this might work in higher education is not specified.

Deputy Premier Susan Close was recently quoted (InDaily Jan 17) as saying “It’s really important that there be some competition domestically and within the state between universities so that people feel that they have a choice of different kinds of institution”.

Can the Government not see the contradiction in this assertion? If competition is a good thing for Universities, forcing Adelaide and UniSA into a merger will by definition reduce competition!

We have three excellent public Universities in SA offering a range of choices and positive competition for local and international students. If there are some rational arguments for combining them, let’s hear them. – Timothy Miles, Emeritus Professor, The University of Adelaide

Commenting on the opinion piece: Mining hands-off sends wrong investment signal

Sorry Warren, I disagree with your vested interest article. And I’d bet that history will prove you wrong; that there will be plenty invested in mining and exploration in the right places. This old mine site is not one.

We’ll see, but like other comments this is a government decision I applaud. – David Everett

Commenting on the story: Saved school struggles with numbers as neighbours spill over

A smaller school is far preferable than a huge super high school, both for students and teachers. Big is not usually better. Students need a lot of nurturing and teachers need a manageable work load to do their best. – Jane Osborne

Commenting on the story: Tree canopy call to underground power lines

Tree canopy needs to be retained, not only on public land but on private properties as well.

Tree maintenance contractors come on property two or three times a year unannounced, cut the trees more than required just in case, promise to at least give you mulch back and never do.

Trees are being planted to provide shade, hold the soil, create a garden for owners and wildlife and are not allowed to grow because of powerlines.

The cost to tree services would be quite high given the frequency they need to be engaged. and none cares about inconveniences they create when coming on private properties unannounced and owners have no right to refuse them entry. – Irina Ferouleva