Farmers want detail on Adelaide’s Murray water diversion plan

Australia’s peak farming body wants more detail on how the Morrison government will funnel 100 gigalitres of Murray River water towards fodder producers, after its deal to pay South Australia to ramp up its desalinaton plant to allow river flow to be diverted to agriculture.


Nov 08, 2019, updated Nov 08, 2019
The desalination plant at Port Stanvac. Photo: supplied

The desalination plant at Port Stanvac. Photo: supplied

Under a deal announced yesterday by the State and Federal governments, Adelaide’s desalination plant at Port Stanvac will increase production to provide 40GL of water this financial year, and a further 60GL in the 2020/21 financial year, depending on a review.

The move means an equivalent amount of water which would usually be withdrawn from the river for consumption would now be freed up for use by farmers.

The Marshall Government said the deal would have no adverse impact on South Australian water prices or security.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the diverted river water was expected to grow up to 120,000 tonnes of fodder for breeding stock in desperate need.

Up to 6000 farmers are expected to access the water originally destined for Adelaide.

“We are keen to understand more of the detail around exactly how the 100 gigalitres of new water will be allocated and managed for southern basin fodder producers,” National Farmers’ Federation president Fiona Simson said today.

The NFF has broadly welcomed the other measures, but also wants a plan to deal with future droughts.

Labor’s water spokesman Terri Butler wants the release of a feasibility study into the desalination plant, which was due to be presented to government in March.

“We need it so we can get a sense of whether the decision to turn on the plant is aligned with the science and what other opportunities are there to use the desalination plant,” she told AAP.

The new measures also include a program to allow small businesses dependent on agriculture to apply for loans of up to $500,000 that can be used to pay staff, buy equipment and refinance.

Pastoralists’ Association of West Darling vice president Lachlan Gall said some farmers would be reluctant to take on more debt.

“We just don’t know how long the drought is going to go,” he told AAP.

InDaily in your inbox. The best local news every workday at lunch time.
By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement andPrivacy Policy & Cookie Statement. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

It would still take about nine to 18 months for grains to be ready for harvest once it rains again.

“When the drought breaks it rains out of the sky but it doesn’t rain cash,” Gall said.

Senior cabinet minister Peter Dutton denied the government was saddling farmers with more debt, saying each business needed to be looked at individually.

“But it does have the potential to help some farmers either restock, to make sure that they can get through the next stage of drought, or to redefine their business,” he told the Nine Network on Friday.

“I think it gives that flexibility.”

The government will also redirect $200 million from the Building Better Regions Fund to support drought-stricken communities, and pump an extra $138.9 million into road projects.

Each of the 122 drought-affected councils and shires along the east coast will be given an extra $1 million, if they need it.

At least six new shires and councils will also be offered $1 million.

-with AAP

Want to comment?

Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.

We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.

InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.

Local News Matters
Copyright © 2024 InDaily.
All rights reserved.