Auditor-General called in over Coalition water buyback controversy

The auditor-general will review all taxpayer-funded water purchases since 2008, as the Coalition looks to ease pressure over a controversial buyback worth almost $80 million.

Apr 23, 2019, updated Apr 23, 2019
Photo: AAP/Lukas Coch

Photo: AAP/Lukas Coch

Water has been in the spotlight since questions re-emerged about then-water minister Barnaby Joyce’s role in approving the 2017 purchase of 28.7 gigalitres from Eastern Australia Agriculture.

“This morning I have written to the auditor-general of the Australian National Audit Office to ask him to review all water purchases from 2008 onward to make sure the community can continue to have confidence in the Murray-Darling Basin Plan,” Agriculture Minister David Littleproud told reporters in Tamworth on Tuesday.

The move came hours after Prime Minister Scott Morrison defended Joyce’s role in the controversial water purchase which splashed almost $80 million of taxpayers’ money when he was the minister in charge.

Morrison also dismissed suggestions there was anything wrong with Eastern Australia Agriculture donating $55,000 to the Liberal Party four years before the sale.

Labor is not ruling out supporting a Greens push for a royal commission into the Murray-Darling Basin Plan over the water buyback from two Queensland properties.

But Morrison is confident Joyce acted appropriately despite questions over the high price and the company’s links.

“The minister relied on the advice provide by his department,” Morrison told ABC News Breakfast on Tuesday.

“That department conducted those negotiations at arm’s length and inquired into the relevant matters required under the Act. The minister has acted in accordance with the legislation.”

In an extraordinary interview, Joyce said he didn’t care if a royal commission investigated the issue because he was “absolutely confident” in his position.

“So go right ahead, knock yourself out, have the inquiry,” the former deputy prime minister told ABC Radio National on Monday.

Morrison said suggestions a $55,000 political donation in 2013 had any part in the water sale were misinformed.

“There is no evidence to suggest that played any role in this arrangement,” he said.

Labor has demanded more information on the purchase from the Agriculture and Water Resources Department, which water spokesman Tony Burke believes paid over the odds.

“You don’t pay Versace prices for water that you get from The Reject Shop and that looks like what Barnaby Joyce has done,” he told reporters in Cairns.

Morrison said the water buyback program had been run strictly within the rules and subject to regular reviews by the auditor-general.

InDaily in your inbox. The best local news every workday at lunch time.
By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement andPrivacy Policy & Cookie Statement. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

He noted the previous Labor government had dealt with Eastern Australia Agriculture, citing a $300 million water purchase.

Labor argues the difference is that its buybacks were conducted through a competitive tender process.

Morrison has also defended Energy Minister Angus Taylor, who was once a director of Eastern Australia Agriculture.

Taylor co-founded the company that sold the water but said he’d had nothing to do with it since entering parliament and received no benefit from the sale.

Joyce said the federal government had acted on a recommendation from the Queensland government, which confirmed it backed the buyback.

“The Queensland government was supportive of the purchase because it helped achieve the basin plan water recovery targets,” state Natural Resources Minister Anthony Lynham said in a statement.

Lynham said the price and any connection Mr Taylor had to Eastern Australia Agriculture were matters for the federal government.


Want to comment?

Send us an email, making it clear which story you’re commenting on and including your full name (required for publication) and phone number (only for verification purposes). Please put “Reader views” in the subject.

We’ll publish the best comments in a regular “Reader Views” post. Your comments can be brief, or we can accept up to 350 words, or thereabouts.

InDaily has changed the way we receive comments. Go here for an explanation.

Local News Matters
Copyright © 2024 InDaily.
All rights reserved.